no editing functions present on picasa 3.9

#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 android
#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 code
#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 plus
#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 professional

Google+ Photos Replaces Picasa Web in the Navigati.Picasa is one of the industry leading image managers and image editing tools.

#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 code

Google Will Discontinue Google Buzz and Code Search Google Encrypted Search for Logged-in Users New Icons for Games and Music in Google Chrome Google Reader Will Integrate With Google+

#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 plus

Google's Plus Operator, No Longer Available How Steve Jobs Influenced Google's Restructuring Google Tests a New Search Interface for Tablets I won't be able to use Google+ for albums until they fix that. My error or not, that's not supposed to happen, and certainly G+ isn't functioning as it should. Appears to be MISSING PHOTOS, but not the same ones that were missing from the album! They are still in there somewhere because the labels and text are still there, the photo is missing. Looked thru the G+ album and gee whiz there are dark squares WHERE SOME PHOTOS HAD BEEN in the album. I uploaded a bunch of photos from Impress, the good slideshow app on Ubuntu's repo (I really love Impress but its too big to email an entire slideshow) and I need to find a web-linked slideshow app like the good one Picasa had for a new Google+ album.

Since I only have a few albums and have only now started my profile I had no real troubles until yesterday. In use of the app I found more stuff wrong, even more annoying: If people don't complain Google will never fix it. Yeah, that's a missing function, I have to click on the photo to see any label. Google has lost its way but I HAVCW LOST MY LIFE! Reply Delete I can't take it getting way too much spam and texts and stuff that i nver got on iphone.

#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 android

I really thought google was great once not anymore and I have an android now rendered useless. On facebook I can decide not on google plus. Before i could get them now it is just people pictures so I can tag people then they have to see my whole album.yes show everyone my whole life maybe there are some things I don't want to share google. If I don't have it bookmarked and I pay for extra memory can I get my photos back under my email I have lots of them. How stupid is that? Wow this is what everyone is talking about.lame. How many jewelry designers work there? I loved google and picasa. I hear that they ask people at google what they think only that is what a google employee told me that they are the testers so that is why. I pay them extra for memory but they are not of people. I had pictures of my designs there since 2005 and they are all gone. I'm considering migrating all my photos elsewhere, and inviting my friends to follow. Given all this, I don't trust Picasa anymore. But highly annoying is that I cannot link to my 'following' people's Picasa accounts - THOSE LINKS GO TO G+. Oh, and I've informed all of my friends, and guess what, some of them are canceling too.Ĭancelling improved things dramatically, for now, since I now (sometimes) get linked to my friend's Picasa straight, and mine get linked straight too. Well done Google, your promotion convinced an early G+ adopter to CANCEL. No, I wanted to send Mom to PICASA if I copy a PICASA address/Ħ - No way to undo or change any of this, unless. OMG!Ģ - all my friends links now go straight to the crappy interface.ĥ - MY links, even when copied straight, go to G+. Then I realized how much I had lost since:ġ - G+ has a CRAPPY CRAPPY interface. Then they hid everybody, making it a hassle. I used to love that you could easily find your friends (e.g. Also, there is no problem with creating multiple Gmail accounts, while it's allowed to create SINGLE G+ profile per person.

#No editing functions present on picasa 3.9 professional

I hope they will NEVER force gmail users to start G+ profiles, or otherwise this really good mail service will falter, as it's used both for private and professional goals, and it might be embarassing for a professional to use email associated with social site. So new users of G+ are not coming,FB is still strong, but even they are losing users due to privacy concerns (or simply lack of profound interest in such activity), so Google thinks it good idea to FORCE people to use their social networking site? Well, this can be the first step for many people to part from Google services (maybe with exception of the search engine). This is really stupid, especially given that 'social networking' sites as Facebook or Google + are receiving more and more criticism for the threats such form of networking itself poses to human privacy.